Publications Search

Search for publications by author
Search for publications by abstract keyword(s)

Knowledge, views and expectations for cancer polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey of health professionals


Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are becoming increasingly available in clinical practice to evaluate cancer risk. However, little is known about health professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and expectations of PRS. An online questionnaire was distributed by relevant health professional organisations predominately in Australia, Canada and the US to evaluate health professionals' knowledge, views and expectations of PRS. Eligible participants were health professionals who provide cancer risk assessments. Results from the questionnaire were analysed descriptively and content analysis was undertaken of free-text responses. In total, 105 health professionals completed the questionnaire (genetic counsellors 84%; oncologists 6%; clinical geneticists 4%; other 7%). Although responses differed between countries, most participants (61%) had discussed PRS with patients, 20% had ordered a test and 14% had returned test results to a patient. Confidence and knowledge around interpreting PRS were low. Although 69% reported that polygenic testing will certainly or likely influence patient care in the future, most felt unprepared for this. If scaled up to the population, 49% expect that general practitioners would have a primary role in the provision of PRS, supported by genetic health professionals. These findings will inform the development of resources to support health professionals offering polygenic testing, currently and in the future.

Type Journal
ISBN 1399-0004 (Electronic) 0009-9163 (Linking)
Authors Smit, A. K.; Sharman, A. R.; Espinoza, D.; Wallingford, C.; Young, M. A.; Dunlop, K.; Tiller, J.; Newson, A. J.; Meiser, B.; Cust, A. E.; Yanes, T.
Responsible Garvan Author Mary-Anne Young
Published Date 2021-10-31
Published Volume 100
Published Issue 4
Published Pages 430-439
Status Published in-print
DOI 10.1111/cge.14025
URL link to publisher's version